The VRM Social Network
Session Topic: The VRM Social Network
Wednesday 2C
Convener: Drummond Reed
Notes-taker: Micah McGraw
Inspired by: Doc Searls' blog post "What Would a VRM Social Network Be?
Tags for the session - technology discussed/ideas considered:
VRM, Social Networking, Ello, Diapora
Discussion notes, key understandings, outstanding questions, observations, and, if appropriate to this discussion: action items, next steps:
VRM and social networking
- Respect Network
- Open standard personal distribution cloud
- Trust frameworks
- Ello and Diaspora
- Projectvrm.org - Doc Searls' blog post "What Would a VRM Social Network Be?
- New paradigm from client server - graph based???
- Social networks before social networks (Rolodex)
- Where is social information centralized
- Minimum viable centralization
- Burning to bit coin and beyond
- Targeting the young builders that are unaware of the rules (rule breaker)
- 1990 silo email providers with proprietary system
- 2000 SMTP
- What will the evolution of social networking look like
- Committee of the whole
- Personas
- Context == conduct
- Home on the web that's theirs - social networking is like share cropping
- What are the metaphors that describe the new paradigm
- Domainofonesown
- Identity is not node it's the connection
- Domain is home
- Where never not on the net anymore
- Xdi/uma/openid
- Book: Value Networks
- Blogs were the early social networks
- Do people really embrace central authority's
- Cookie model - do we want to be plate the cookie or chocolate chip
- Place/location is the strongest metaphor we have
- Verna Allee – “Value Networks”
- Metaphor or email – it will evolve the same
- Distributed may not survive
- How do you respect people digitally
- How many people have their own domains
- Usefulness to these metaphors, but let us also transcend them
- A domain of my own
- Reinventing what came before the wheel
- What is our personal graph -> Calf/cow is the problem
- What is personal Graph?
- Address books and contacts
- Calendars
- Problem in selling big companies on graph models
- What is it that gives us independence and a way to engage?
- Peer-to-peer
- Minimum viable centralization
VRM Social Network – Part II
Date – October 30, 2014
Doc Searls was in the session.
Goal of today’s session:
6 Properties:
1) Decentralized
2) Heterarchy
3) Interoperability
4) Substitutability
5) Independence
6) Openness
Pain Points that exist in the current solutions:
1) Not everyone is on it – true ubiquity (Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter)
2) Privacy and Personal Data
- a. Privacy is a new luxury good.
- b. Privacy – when they understand what it costs.
3) Discrimination
4) Security (lack of)
5) Freedom Infringement
6) Legal – privacy by consent cannot be known (big data problem).
7) Economic measure of accountability – how to be an economic actor.
VRM:
1) Independence/Agency
2) Sovereignty
3) Ability to engage socially
Principals:
1) The nodes are people
2) Mirror the same architecture of the Internet
3) A place for value exchange between people
4) Must come from the people
5) 4 party model
6) Relationships/Connections
Political Movement Framework:
1) Digital Personhood
2) [Marc Davis’ talk at Privacy/Identity/Innovation 2011] (see about half-way down the page)