DID WG Q&A

DID WG Q&A

Session: 9F

Convener: Brent Zundel

Notes-taker(s): Brent Zundel

Tags for the session - technology discussed/ideas considered: DID, W3C, standardization

Discussion notes, key understandings, outstanding questions, observations, and, if appropriate to this discussion: action items, next steps:

Primary discussion involved questions about the progress of the DID WG, i.e., what are we currently working on, what are the key discussions, what is the scope of the work, etc.

Rough summary of answers given: We are working to define DIDs, related documents, and guidelines for DID Method specifications. We are talking about metadata and where it belongs, DID resolution contracts, and DID URL parameters.

If there is something you want the DID WG to talk about, or if there is something that needs to be added to/removed from the spec, please raise issues on our repositories: http://www.w3.org/2019/did-wg/

Saved Zoom Chat:

09:57:03 From Chris Lee : Catch you guys later!

10:28:02 From Dan Burnett : webex stole my mic

10:28:12 From Dan Burnett : and won' give it back

10:28:45 From Dan Burnett : what i was going to say is that "A DID identifies a DID Subject, and a DID Subject is the Subject of the DID" :)

10:29:04 From Dan Burnett : trying to rejoin

10:29:04 From Will Abramson : hahah

10:30:18 From Dan Burnett : Read

10:30:23 From Dan Burnett : Create, Read, Update, Delete

10:30:37 From Dan Burnett : maybe now resolve :)

10:31:11 From Dan Burnett : Mic still not available to Zoom. My preceding WebEx call definitely didn't release it :(

10:31:50 From Dan Burnett : until the mic resource lock expires

10:32:21 From Dan Burnett : DID methods

10:34:29 From Will Abramson : Possibly this- http://github.com/WebOfTrustInfo/rwot9-prague/blob/master/draft-documents/decentralized-did-rubric.md still a WIP

10:36:14 From Dan Burnett : The rubric will be published as a non-standards-track (informative) document by the W3C DID Working Group

10:36:26 From Will Abramson : cool