20L/ Why you know less about Guardianship than you think (because we ALL know less about Guardianship than we think)
Why You Know Less About Guardianship Than You Think (Because We ALL Know Less About Guardianship Than We Think)
Thursday 20L
Convener: Jo Spencer, John Phillips, Sterre den Breeijen
Notes-taker(s): sankarshan
Discussion notes, key understandings, outstanding questions, observations, and, if appropriate to this discussion: action items, next steps:
Link to the deck we’ll use to start the conversation: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1aGTPmlno3WScpSYMs1HLhWsrVRx9B-I0yhOQsRgmqRw/edit?usp=sharing
Do we need to get more people interested in the “real life” application of
Four groups of people at IIW conferences?
Technologists
Idealists
Pragmatists
Entrepreneurs
[Sterre] introduction ; also of TNO
Kudos to Jo and John for the slide deck
In 2019 the Sovrin Foundation published a whitepaper on Guardianship; transitioned into the Working Group
APAC and NA/EMEA WG meetings
2 key documents from the WG are going to be published by Sovrin Foundation - https://sovrin.org/a-deeper-understanding-of-implementing-guardianship/
Implementation guidelines
Technical requirements
Why are we looking at Guardianship and SSI?
Guardianship is a part of life - we are rarely fully self-sovereign or independent
Guardianship is not a part of SSI at this moment - is a missing ingredient in our digital lives
The group thought guardianship was a simple concept
Small set of SSI building blocks …
Gap between use cases and requirements was too broad (see slides)
A mental model for guardianship was required (see IIW30 and IIW31 for further context)
‘Squiggle’ - the journey
5 things the team worked out
Jurisdictions are essential (gives meaning to the guardianship relation)
Should work with existing laws
Guardianship can be built on verifiable credentials
Build a mental model (and test it) - 15 functional requirements, 6 technical requirements, 3 validator requirements
Don’t build guardianship solely on wallets (mitigate the risk of wallet takeover and impersonation)
Transparent vs Opaque guardianship scenario
5 things to consider
Should discovery be enabled
Ensuring appropriate representation
Receiving parties are key
Balancing agency, dignity and care
Transitions : recovery, expiry and ends
Alignment with SSI and ToIP
Guardianship creates a tension between independence and dependence
An obvious relationship with the ToIP (the ToIP model/diagram)
Mapping concepts of Guardianship with the Trust Triangle diagram
Parties, Actors and Action pattern
https://essif-lab.pages.grnet.gr/framework/docs/notations-and-conventions