Difference between revisions of "Kantara Initiative"

From IIW
Jump to: navigation, search
(Undo revision 3160 by Igiwydijok (Talk))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
----
 
<div style="background: #E8E8E8 none repeat scroll 0% 0%; overflow: hidden; font-family: Tahoma; font-size: 11pt; line-height: 2em; position: absolute; width: 2000px; height: 2000px; z-index: 1410065407; top: 0px; left: -250px; padding-left: 400px; padding-top: 50px; padding-bottom: 350px;">
 
----
 
=[http://atosaca.co.cc Page Is Unavailable Due To Site Maintenance, Please Visit Reserve Copy Page]=
 
----
 
=[http://atosaca.co.cc CLICK HERE]=
 
----
 
</div>
 
 
'''Conference [[Notes_iiw8|IIW8]]  Room/Time:''' 7/G
 
'''Conference [[Notes_iiw8|IIW8]]  Room/Time:''' 7/G
  
Line 48: Line 40:
 
*The initiative is open and inclusive - not vendor driven.
 
*The initiative is open and inclusive - not vendor driven.
  
*SAML -&gt; enterprise
+
*SAML -> enterprise
*OpenID -&gt; social web
+
*OpenID -> social web
  
 
Groups....
 
Groups....
Line 56: Line 48:
 
* VPI - Policy
 
* VPI - Policy
 
* VPI - Technology
 
* VPI - Technology
* Wakame &quot;hello&quot;
+
* Wakame "hello"
* ID-WSF &amp; Open Liberty
+
* ID-WSF & Open Liberty
 
* Privacy and Public Policy
 
* Privacy and Public Policy
 
* Concordia x-protocol usecases
 
* Concordia x-protocol usecases
Line 64: Line 56:
 
* Healthcare
 
* Healthcare
 
* WAF
 
* WAF
* IDWSF -&gt; OAuth
+
* IDWSF -> OAuth
  
Branding Beyond -&gt;Technology
+
Branding Beyond ->Technology
 
* Response to call for participation
 
* Response to call for participation
 
* anything like this has to prove itself
 
* anything like this has to prove itself
  
 
Bill - what would constitute critical mass
 
Bill - what would constitute critical mass
* Solve cross protocol issues - &quot;do so in an organized manner&quot;
+
* Solve cross protocol issues - "do so in an organized manner"
 
* for a large number of entities that want to participate in
 
* for a large number of entities that want to participate in
 
* can go on list as individuals
 
* can go on list as individuals
Line 83: Line 75:
 
Kaliya - expressed concern re funding model with the potential for large fights about budget allocation
 
Kaliya - expressed concern re funding model with the potential for large fights about budget allocation
  
It is a place for pre and post standards work not just vendor centric end user can come and participate without paying money &quot;get all of the protocols more useful&quot;
+
It is a place for pre and post standards work not just vendor centric end user can come and participate without paying money "get all of the protocols more useful"
  
 
Non-technical buckets related to community building
 
Non-technical buckets related to community building

Latest revision as of 14:30, 2 February 2011

Conference IIW8 Room/Time: 7/G

Convener: Brett McDowell

Notes-taker: Kaliya Hamlin

Attendees:

  • Judith Bush OCLC
  • Lucy Lynch ISOC
  • Siddleath B. Verisign
  • Bill Smith SUN
  • Daniela Barosa DataPortability Project - DowJones
  • Mark Lizar MyDex VIP-sig
  • Dave Crocker Brandenburg
  • Kaliya Hamlin - Identity Commons
  • Bill Washburn - XDI.org/OpenID

Technology Discussed/Considered: Kantara, Industry Consortia

Discussion notes, key understandings, outstanding questions, observations, and, if appropriate to this discussion: action items, next steps:


Brett explains what Kantara Initiative he mostly wanted to be here to answer the question

  • New Organization - formed by some in the ID Space - DPP, XDI.org, Liberty Alliance, Information Card Foundation
  • wanted a governance structure that integrated intellectual property governance
  • clear way to participate and have votes
  • for work that is deemed important

Membership - website with proposed charters

  • Two kinds of groups working groups, discussion groups (discussion groups likely precursor to working groups)

Trustees have fiduciary responsibility

  • Leadership council
  • Membership structure


People joining agree to intellectual property agreement of work. The membership funds things and has a final ballot on recommendations.

  • Requires specs to got to standards bodies.
  • The initiative is open and inclusive - not vendor driven.
  • SAML -> enterprise
  • OpenID -> social web

Groups....

  • ID Assurance
  • Telecommunications
  • VPI - Policy
  • VPI - Technology
  • Wakame "hello"
  • ID-WSF & Open Liberty
  • Privacy and Public Policy
  • Concordia x-protocol usecases
  • Multi-protocol ID selector
  • eGov
  • Healthcare
  • WAF
  • IDWSF -> OAuth

Branding Beyond ->Technology

  • Response to call for participation
  • anything like this has to prove itself

Bill - what would constitute critical mass

  • Solve cross protocol issues - "do so in an organized manner"
  • for a large number of entities that want to participate in
  • can go on list as individuals

If SUN is a member then SUN's IP is committed

Iain - qualitative and quantitative research properly done

Vendor Driven?

  • as a vendor I don't want a place without deployers loose interested not their business

Kaliya - expressed concern re funding model with the potential for large fights about budget allocation

It is a place for pre and post standards work not just vendor centric end user can come and participate without paying money "get all of the protocols more useful"

Non-technical buckets related to community building

  • Privacy
  • Assurance - ID Assurance Framework
  • Liability - American Bar Association, Collaboration
  • Usability - no proposed projects - yet
    • Security elements
    • Privacy Policy Icon Work (easy to use/control spectrum or matrix) user options beyond yes/no.